*During my senior year
of college, I interned at a refugee resettlement agency, helping refugees to
find employment in the United States.*
We were looking for a story and could do no better than his
– he who fled over an ocean looking for peace, arriving in this country with
nothing but the clothes on his back and a fierce work ethic. He was perfect for
our purposes – a model refugee. He works now at the sort of job where one might
wear a tie.
I wrote the story based on glowing second-hand accounts and
sent it by email asking his permission to share it with our partners and
sponsors – they would like his story, we knew it. We hoped he would be proud.
Several hours later, his wife replied. Please change the
names, she said. Change the identifying information. Do not say how poor we
were. Do not say I am still earning my GED.
I was shocked. The story of triumph I thought I wrote was to
her a story of shame. She read the story that I wrote, and did not claim it.
That was not the story of her family that she wanted to tell.
I don’t know why I was shocked, as surprised as I had been
when the woman in a rural village wouldn’t pose for a picture until she had
changed her shirt and put on lipstick – as surprised as I had been to see that
someone without running water would not only own lipstick but would care how
she looked in it.
As if those of us with social media accounts, with our
carefully curated humanity, somehow hold a monopoly on embarrassment and pride,
caring what strangers think about us, wanting to be seen in the best light.
I started to wonder how many of the crying children with
swollen bellies had been asked before their picture had been snapped – whether
mothers knew what words and causes their children’s faces were selling.
“Power,” says Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie in her excellent TED
talk, “Is the ability not just to tell the story of another person, but to
make it the definitive story of that person.”
I had told a story – graciously, clumsily – of a family who
had been helped, and in the process had defined them as a family who needed
help. The before and after pictures I painted were compelling in a narrative
sense but lacked complexity and an awareness of who this family really was.
“The single story creates stereotypes and the problem with
stereotypes is not that they are untrue, but that they are incomplete. They
make one story become the only story,” Adichie continues.
Organizations, churches, and individuals are becoming
increasingly aware of the need for advocacy – yet in our eagerness to be “a
voice for the voiceless” it is all too easy to be the very ones drowning out
perfectly sound voices. In control of another’s narrative, we shape it to our
own purposes. We claim a power we have no right to claim, making our stories the
definitive stories of the people we think we are helping.
I think that to see our neighbors fully means more than
telling stories of what they lack. This is not to say that all stories must
have happy endings, or reflect lives that don’t exist – but truth and love
demand a more complete picture. A story, perhaps, that people are proud to
claim. A picture of a child its mother would treasure.
“If we are to love our neighbors, before doing anything else
we must see our neighbors,” writes Frederick Buechner. “…like artists we must
see not just their faces but the life behind and within their faces.”
This was my mistake. I tried to tell a story without knowing
the lives behind it, without caring. I did not publish that story, however
remarkable I still find it. It was not mine to share.
I’ll keep writing other people’s stories, but I appreciate
now how great the responsibility is. To be trusted with another person’s story
is to be trusted with their life – to define how others see them and respond to
them.
I’ll keep telling other people’s stories, but only when I know
them, and only when the stories remain their own.
No comments:
Post a Comment